Oh boy! I’m so excited! I can’t believe I have my hands on this bad boy. It’s like Christmas in err December?
But seriously, let start with a bit of history. It’s been 3 ½ years since the Mavic II Pro was released. At the time this drone was priced around $1,300 and could top out at $2,000 with additional batteries, accessories, and a smart controller. In 2020 the company introduced the Mavic Air II, a similar but less expensive drone that started at around $1,000. Similar photo/video quality, range. Ergo a great value.
So is the Mavic III worth it? Is the latest and greatest worth your hard-earned $?
Snitz’s Mavic 3 don’t likes!
#1: Crazy expensive. The drone starts at $2,300 and rapidly goes to $3,000 with some needed extra batteries/accessories. Want the smart controller, more onboard memory, and video codecs? BAM your at $5,000. WTF!
#2. BTW, the Mavic 3 also sports a second 162mm equivalent telephoto lens. Drum roll…which sucks. Only 12 MP, shoots only JPEGs (at this current time). Won’t produce reproducible content. Perhaps future software updates will allow this lens to shoot in RAW.
Now that I’m done complaining, on to the good stuff. What I really like about the Mavic 3.
1. Much better sensor: While the same resolution (20MP) as the Mavic II and Air 2 this drone has a Micro 4/3rds sensor. Ergo the more modern sensor is twice the size. This drastically reduces noise and improves dynamic range (by about 1 stop)*. It’s also much more ISO invariant and produces superior images in low light. In the past, to get clean reproducible images, I’d need to shoot a burst of 5 shots and noise stack*. Now I can get good quality from one image.
2. While the drone’s forward/backward travel speed hasn’t improved, it’s ascending/descending speed has doubled (8meters/sec vs 4 up, 6/3 down).
3. The Mavic 3’s flight time is improved from 31 mins to 46 minutes. This is huge. Normally it takes 5-10 minutes to get my drone in position to photograph (especially if I’m traveling to a remote location). Considering I need to leave 20-25% battery available to return home, the earlier drones usually allowed only 15 minutes of actual shooting time. The Mavic 3 allows almost 30. Twice as much is better! Plus, because I often shoot at altitudes of over 1,000 feet, the faster ascent/descent speeds save precious time.
4. Better range. 10 miles vs 6 with the smart controller. In real-world operations, I typically was able to fly the Mavic II Pro about 2.5 miles away before I’d run out of signal strength. The Mavic 3 realistically stretches that to about 4 miles. As a nature photographer who shoots in faraway places, trying to generate unique compositions, this is a significant advantage.
Bottom line: The Mavic 3 is really geared for Pros or serious amateurs. It’s an expensive but great piece of hardware. For most hobbyists, the Mavic Air II continues to be the way to go.
PS. I’m typically using drones for still photography. The Mavic 3 has a number of video improvements, including superior object following that aren’t discussed here.
*Some of you may notice that the Mavic II Pro was listed as having 14 stops of dynamic range compared to 12.8 for the Mavic 3. What gives? After speaking with DJI’s tech support, they sheepishly admitted that the Mavic II only has 12 stops of range. The previously published specs were in fact wrong. Imagine that!
**Noise stacking is a technique to reduce noise by combining multiple images, typically in Photoshop. https://www.slrlounge.com/remove-reduce-noise-from-your-images/